New Narrative Guide - We want your feedback

Hi All,

Some of you already know the narrative inside out, but if you’re still getting to know it, we’ve got a new guide to help. It’ll show you how to make the most of the narrative to plan and shape your writing.

Check out the Narrative Guide for Writers here

We’d love you to take a look and tell us what you think. Both seasoned veterans and newcomers alike. Let us know whether we missed anything important and what you’d like to learn about next. Your feedback makes all the difference!

Please drop a comment to tell us how you like to use the narrative, whether you use it on its own or alongside the timeline. If you have any tips or tricks that others might find useful, we’d love for you to share them. Your insights could really make a difference for someone else in the community.

Also, be sure to keep your eyes peeled - Guides for syncing your Narrative with Scrivener and Ulysses are coming soon!

2 Likes

@AeonRob, I had an “aha” moment with regard not just to the documentation but to how to make the user interface less confusing for new users. It’s unrehearsed (obviously!), but I think I get the thoughts across eventually. :slight_smile:

3 Likes

@AeonRob: I find the instructions understandable; however, I am already familiar with the concept. In any case, it is good how the use cases are explained here.

I would like to emphasize one point, and I agree with @SCN: The chapter structure and an underlying dramaturgical structure are not mutually exclusive. The instructions, however, suggest that the software’s narrative tree structure should represent one or the other.
The leading view for most authors is probably the chapter structure. If there is to be an additional breakdown on a more abstract level, into acts or story beats for example, which then also includes plot points etc., then it makes sense to visualize this by other means, as @SCN demonstrates with his tags. This problem is touched on rather roughly in the instructions, so that the really challenging questions arise later during the work. But that’s what the forum is for, isn’t it?

3 Likes

It occurs to me I probably miss out on a lot since I’m not a Scrivener user.

If there was a real document attached to each event and each data item, AT would be a lot more usable. I can see syncing to Scrivener might satisfy that.

On the other hand, updating things would be a two step process. Update the timeline, sync to Scrivener and vice versa.

Scrivener is great but it lies outside my workflow. A document, not just a tiny description in the inspector, would be a really cool thing.

1 Like

Thanks for taking the time to record your thoughts @SCN. You made some really good points about potential UI improvements that we’ve taken on board.

Also, great feedback from yourself and @Peter_T about parts of the article that could be made clearer. We’ve made a quick edit so far and will think about how we can improve the rest of the article.

1 Like

A syncing guide with tips about how to use scrivener custom metadata to get the most info transferred over. One trick for me is to save the project I intend to sync as a copy labeled title of project Aeon. This way I have the original project open while on aeon after sinking copy. Close copy and fix issues in original while aeon open. After done delete copy and sync original.

@Goaliedad It’s definitely not a bad idea to make a copy of both your timeline and Scrivener files and store them in a separate folder whenever you reach a milestone or change something in the sync settings. That way you’ve always got a backup on hand.

We’re working on a guide to syncing with Scrivener that covers syncing custom metadata, and lots of other handy tips. We hope to have that published soon!

2 Likes

Great thanks, I am really enjoying the software and exploring the possibilities. I am using a nearly completed novel to understand the program and look forward to implementing this with a fantasy novel which I’m in the planning stage on.

1 Like

Thank you for the video. First let me just say that the easiest way to understand Narrative vs Timeline is that Timeline is all the events in your story, even the ones that are not on-page, and Narrative is just what is in the manuscript in the order it appears there.

Also, one thing that is not clear with the documentation is that a scene in often made up of multiple events, and you have to break your scenes into sub-scenes in Scrivener in order for this to work. Most writers, I don’t think, use sub-scenes in Scrivener. I actually looked at the Orient Express sample and confirmed that they used multiple events and thus Narrative “scenes” (actually sub-scenes) for what is one scene (and often one scene per chapter) in the manuscript itself.

This is how most writers work:
Screenshot 2025-12-08 at 6.59.54 AM

This is how AT forces them to work if they want to track multiple events in one “scene”:

Screenshot 2025-12-08 at 7.02.03 AM

They would have to work in the Scene in Scrivener by selecting it and the 3 event sub-scenes in order for those 3 events to sync properly with the Timeline view.

Screenshot 2025-12-08 at 7.04.35 AM

I don’t know many writers who only work one event in each scene. One big event, maybe, but I don’t think that’s clear in the documentation. After years at this I had to dig into the Orient Express manuscript to see what they were actually doing. This is why I think it’s so confusing.

Anyway…

I keep going back and forth on using AT because it doesn’t quite do what I need it to do. The Narrative view is my favorite because of the stacking cards and it’s the number one reason I come back to AT. I find it a better brainstorming tool than the Mindmap which I do not like at all (it’s clunky; sorry). And by Narrative workflow, I mean that I like to start with the characters’ individual storylines and not really worry about how it will fit in the timeline or the “outline” of the finished novel. Not at this stage.

So for example, Maeve’s storyline would be one Narrative folder with multiple sub-documents in it as I drop in the things that happen to Maeve. Sometimes, like in single viewpoint novels, Maeve’s storyline may not appear at all in the manuscript since she’s not the PoV, Talia is. But I need to know what’s happening to and with Maeve, even if the reader doesn’t see those things on-page. The reason this planning has to take place in the Narrative, not the Timeline (at least for me) is that I can’t seem to think in a Gantt chart, but a board with cards independent of actual dates/days, works.

Then I will create more Narrative folders, one for each storyline/character, and move them around until I get a plot (the actual sequence of events). A lot of what is on these cards will not be on-page even in a multiple viewpoint novel. Despite having multiple storylines set up as “Narrative Folders” this is still not an outline as each chapter is actually just a story arc. The Outline proper comes in later as I merge the events happening to the characters into a 4-Act structure which is the end product, not how I start.

I think there’s a lot of assumption in the underlying way that AT works that we start with a story that’s already been structured (laid out in narrative or chronological order) . When you already have a book that’s been written (like Orient Express) and you break that down this makes sense. But when you don’t have a complete book that’s already laid out, that has a lot of stuff that may not make it on-page, then the workflow is quite different. Even in the Orient Express example, the actual chapters contained only one scene (no scene dividers) with multiple events that in AT are represented as separate “scenes” in order to make them work with the events on the Timeline.

I hope that what I’ve said makes sense.

I’m off to try working with Scrivener in the sub-scene format to see if I can make it work, but it’ll be a major adjustment. I’ll have to remember to select all the sub-scenes (events) that make up the actual scene. If I forget and accidentally click only in the “Scene” or forget to select the sub-scenes (events) then it’ll be a major issue.

If anyone has any suggestions or alternatives, or I’m misunderstanding/mis-working something I’m all ears. But I don’t see how else to do this since all of my actual scenes (as in Act–>Chapter–>Scene) are made up of multiple events.

I wish there was a way to pop up an edit window on a notes field component of an event. I might want to write a 500 word description of what happens in an event and see it in a comfortable window.

That would be a game changing feature in my uses.

For bonus points, let me choose the editor for that field. BBEdit, Word, TextEdit, whatever I want, and support preview in plain text, Markdown, docx, and rtf.

1 Like

Hi @m2foster thanks for your feedback.

The examples we’ve used in the various templates and demo timelines are intended as a starting point, or source of inspiration for how the app can be used, but there’s really no right or wrong way to do it.

Ultimately, it’s up to personal interpretation. Everyone uses the app a little differently, and the best method is whatever works best for you.

A couple of things you might find useful:

  1. You can rename the section labels in the narrative and set the hierarchy to whatever you like. Maybe passages would be more suitable if you don’t want to use sub-scenes.

  1. You can also change the numbering system to break events out into whole scenes instead of the indexed numbers seen in the Orient Express example.

2 Likes

Thanks for the clarification and for saying that there’s no wrong way to use it. I often think I must be using it wrong. I do have the AT Narrative Sections set up with something other than sub-scene (exposition for example). Perhaps I’m not being clear on what I’m asking.

I took your Orient Express file and synced it with Scrivener. This is how the addition of “Passage” came through in the Scrivener document (it created a “scene” from it).

Is there a way to set up the sync so that only certain AT Narrative Sections (Part, Chapter, Scene) sync with Scrivener, but others (Passage) do not? Because I don’t want that added “passage 1” in Scrivener but I need it in AT, especially in the planning stages when I’m using the Narrative cards to move things around.

If there is not a way to do this, is it something that might be doable in the future? Thank you.

1 Like

Since no one else has ventured an answer…

I’m unaware of a way to sync only specified narrative sections to Scrivener. It’s all or nothing, so far as I can see.

That said, I worry that adding such a feature would introduce unnecessary complexity that could flummox newer users. (“Hey, why aren’t my sub-passages syncing to Scrivener?”)

As a practical matter, you can delete a section (such as a scene or passage) in either Scrivener or AT, then re-sync, as you work out your narrative. I do this all the time. Since Scrivener saves deleted documents in the Trash, you can always retrieve them if you later decide you need them.

1 Like

Why not create a free text item in the inspector and call it passages and let the info piggyback on a scene, and you could change the color associated with an event with passages contained inside. You could display in the narrative view by choosing to display but it would not sync with Scrivener.

1 Like

Do you mean like this?

I did set this up in AT as I would use it, with a Chapter holding a Scene and then a Scene holding an event and a Passage:

Screenshot 2025-12-13 at 7.23.59 AM

When I sync with Scrivener, I get this, which is the problem (there are two text documents in the Scrivener scene):


You have select and work in three separate documents in Scrivener that constitute one Scene.

Am I understanding you right?

No, and I may not have down what you want but here is a way to get text info in without adding a scene. See Scrivener set up with custom metadata text field called story notes (could be passages)


Now sync with Aeon and see the notes in the Inspector under Story Notes as a text field, but not on the Narrative area unless change Card display options. I show it both ways.
Can click on image made it large to see better, open and view if not clear.

This is a cool idea but how did you setup the AT Sync settings to bring in the Scrivener custom metadata text field.?

1 Like

I created a custom metadata field which is text based. The name is not important but must be text based with multiline text and also click wrap text for text added.

image
Now add a new property type called in this case Loose info but whatever you want.


Basically made sure multiline and checked all things to associate, think only need events.
Close Scrivener and sync will now find the add custom field and you must associate it with the text field you want to sync with (in this case loose info)

Go thru and hit ok and should work.
In this way can add notes about stuff to remind me in AT3 from scrivener.

3 Likes

Oh, now that is very cool. I had not used AT properties in this manner with Scrivener custom metadata.

Right off the bat this is a great way to feed ToDo stuff too and fro between AT and Scrivener. For that purpose alone, I reduce the number of hops in between the two apps. I just created a TKL Collection in scrivener to monitor this - I preface the comment (on either side) with TKL: . Classic tickler system. And it works both ways. Nice!

I added that property to all the entities (i.e. characters, locations, etc.) that are sync’d with Scrivener.

Thanks to you I will probably chew up a whole day kicking new tires in really fun ways :slight_smile:

Cheers!

3 Likes

Thanks for sharing that tip @Goaliedad that’s probably going to be the best solution to link the exposition info to each scene without having to manage them as separate documents in Scrivener.

Hopefully that works for you @m2foster Let me know if you need any help getting it set up.

1 Like