I feel perpetually confused about how to structure scene/event link between Scrivener & Aeon. I’m getting the impression that Aeon “wants” there to be one event which corresponds with one scene. But, if I’m understanding correctly, that is counter to the idea of the Narrative view. Here’s where this is causing me problems:
In Scrivener: I have a relatively flat structure right now: Part I, Sc. 1, Sc. 2, etc., Part II…
Each scene may consist of a single event or several events. Eventually, scenes may become parts of chapters, but I haven’t decided on that yet.
In Aeon, obviously, the events are on the timeline. When I sync, the scenes come over to Aeon as scenes unassociated with any events. Then I seem to have two choices: make the event and the scene the same thing, in which case there must be a 1:1 correspondence between events and scenes, so why bother differentiating? Or, nest the events within a scene in the narrative view, so that only the narrative view has scenes (which seems to make sense to me). That works until I sync. When I sync, a new file is created in Scrivener for each event, and each of my scene files in Scrivener is turned into a folder with the empty event nested underneath it. The other problem is that the metadata fields are associated with…I don’t know what…events? scenes? It seems to depend on where they started. Some of my metadata seems best with events (e.g., weather), and other pieces of metadata seem best associated with scenes (thematic elements).
Can anyone explain this to me like I’m 5?
Thank you!