Hi Nicwg,
This grew into quite a long response. Please let me know if it helpful, as it may make sense for me to convert this into a blog post instead.
My entire project is laid out on a sequential basis. I would not expect to work on a Structure for my novel until I had completed the vast majority of my writing.
One way to think about this may be to simply consider the Narrative View (and Outline View) as a visual representation of what your Scrivener manuscript folder looks like.
Letās talk about your flow in Version 2 for a second.
Data
Initially, you would have some combination of the following items:
- Some events in your timeline that you will want to bring into Scrivener now
- Some documents in your Scrivener project that you will want to bring Into your timeline now
- A bunch of events in your timeline that you do not want to sync to Scrivener (yet, or ever)
- A bunch of documents in Scrivener that you do not want to sync to your timeline (yet, or ever)
Actions
From there, you would perform the following actions:
- Move events from your timeline to Scrivener by dragging them into the sync panel
- Move documents from Scrivener to your timeline by dragging them into the timeline
- Ignoring all the rest
It is likely that this process is going to create a fairly messy, unstructured Scrivener project. But that is okay, that is just the stage of the project you are up to.
Letās look at the parallels in Aeon Timeline 3
Like I said at the top, you could think of the Narrative View as:
- A visual representation of your Scrivener binder (either what it is now, or what it is about to become)
- A kind of staging area for you to make those changes
Most importantly, treat the narrative inside your timeline as the equivalent of your Scrivener binder. With the exception of some basic front matter stuff (title page and the like), if you want it inside your Scrivener manuscript, you want it inside your timeline narrative.
Then you are applying the exact same decisions as before:
Data
Initially, you would have some combination of the following items:
- Some events in your timeline that you will want to bring into Scrivener AND your narrative now
- Some documents in your Scrivener project that you will want to bring Into your timeline AND narrative now
- A bunch of events in your timeline that you do not want to include in Scrivener **OR your narrative
- A bunch of documents in Scrivener that you do not want to include in your timeline, but that will be included in your narrative (because the narrative is a representation of the Scrivener manuscript folder).
As you can see, you are dealing with the exact same categories and decisions, it is just the place that you are making the decision now changes slightly.
Actions
Now, the narrative acts as a kind of staging house/buffer zone between Scrivener and your timeline.
-
When you make a change in your Scrivener project such as adding a new document or rearranging the order of some documents, Aeon Timeline will detect that change automatically and indicate you have unsynced changes.
-
Aside from some front-matter type content like title pages that you may choose to ignore, you should sync most of this straight into your narrative (because the narrative is a reflection of your Scrivener binder).
-
Once you have synced the document into your narrative, you can then choose to:
- Assign it dates so that it will appear in your timeline file; or
- Leave it without dates so it exists only in your narrative but not your timeline
-
When you have an event in your timeline that you want to move into your Scrivener project:
-
First, drag the events into your narrative. This is the place for you to work out the order you want to tell things in your story, or possibly organise them with some structure if you are ready to (but it is fine to leave it unstructured)
-
Once you make the change in your narrative, Aeon Timeline will again indicate that things are out of sync, and you should hit Sync as soon as you can to reflect that new structure in your Scrivener project
Summary
When you adopt this mindset, the changes are less significant than they may first assume.
The key benefits are:
-
The new approach automate a few more things, and prompts you as soon as there are changes, which makes it easier to keep things in sync throughout the project lifespan.
-
The narrative view and outline view can be nicer, more visual places to organise things than trying to drop them into the narrow Scrivener binder.
-
By doing your main narrative organisation inside the timeline, you have access to all of the rich data and relationships directly as you work
A final word on messiness
I would not expect to work on a Structure for my novel until I had completed the vast majority of my writing. Now I find that I canāt sync unless I define my Structure ahead of time. Iām not quite sure how to actually solve this issue because at the moment if I use my existing timeline as a structure that will seemingly end up an mess.
You donāt need to fear messiness.
Of course your narrative is going to be messy to start with. It will probably initially be a few key ideas dragged into a vague order, with no idea what structure the actual story may take around it.
That is fine. Start with that. Sync it to Scrivener as a flat list of documents. Write out a few scenes. Sync them back again. Repeat a few times. You can build an entire story that way.
The Narrative is not there to force you to create a complete structure ahead of time. It is a tool to help you find and build the structure when you need it, from whatever material you have available by then.
I hope something in here is useful and helps give you a few ideas. As I said, it will help me to understand which parts resonate (if any), and if there is anything that needs expanding, or culling.
Matt